Put your investment plan together
Chapters
Chapters

Test your plan against six difficult situations

Try six independent situations against one fictional plan. Calculate what changes, identify the decision and amend your own draft where its rules leave a real gap.

Use one starting plan, six separate tests.

Try each situation before opening its discussion. Note the changed fact, affected goal or rule, proposed action, missing information and deadline. Use these fictional facts or adapt your draft; no product selection or price forecast is required.

Each of the six situations is independent. Reset every time. Ignore interest, distributions, costs, taxes and currency movements in calculations unless stated; include relevant items in real implementation.

€60,000 total savings, assigned once
  1. 1 · €10,000 · reserveAccessible bank cash
  2. 2 · €15,000 · nearby billSeparate bank cash; due in 24 months
  3. 3 · €35,000 · long-term portfolioBroker holdings; no investment borrowing

60/40 applies only inside this €35,000 boundary

Shares · €21,000 · 60%Bonds · €14,000 · 40%

Long-term goal
€100,000 in today’s euros in about 15 years; amount/date flexible. Funding adequacy remains an estimate.
Monthly budget
€3,000 take-home income; €2,600 non-investment spending including irregular-bill provision; €400 long-term contribution.
Written allocation rule
Long-term 60/40 target, accepted share band 55–65%. Check quarterly. Outside the band, if still suitable, restore using available contributions and further adjustment after checking costs/taxes.
Other reviews
Full plan annually and after material life/access changes; genuine security problems promptly.

The investment types are assumed understood; no specific products are selected. Amounts, accounts and rules are practice premises, not a recommended reserve, allocation or schedule.

What calls for action after a price move?

1. A fall at the scheduled review

Start again from the original plan. €21,000 shares; €14,000 bonds. Income €3,000; spending €2,600; contribution €400. Bank cash €10,000 + €15,000 remains available.

Shares fall 30%, bonds 5%. Income, goals and spending are unchanged; both cash balances remain available. Calculate portfolio value and share weight. Does the next step follow from the fall, allocation rule or changed household needs?

2. Shares rise faster

Start again from the original plan. €21,000 shares; €14,000 bonds. Income €3,000; contribution €400. Bank cash €10,000 + €15,000 remains available.

Shares rise 50%; bonds unchanged. At the scheduled review someone proposes a higher share target because of the gains. Calculate the weight and distinguish maintenance from a new strategy.

Discuss the fall and rally
Fall only: shares €21,000×0.70; bonds €14,000×0.95. Separate cash unchanged.

Shares / bonds

€14,700 / €13,300

Portfolio

€28,000

Loss €7,000, 20%; shares 52.5%

Below the 55–65% band, a still-suitable target calls for the agreed adjustment. Confirm this capital can stay invested and holdings still serve their roles. Ignoring flows/charges, move €2,100 from bonds to shares: €16,800/€11,200. Check available contributions, costs and taxes in implementation.

The loss is real despite unchanged cash. A genuine goal/capacity mismatch requires reassessing the target first. An emergency-funded extra purchase changes assignments. Neither the fall nor reset establishes a bargain or recovery date.

Independent rally: shares €21,000×1.50; bonds unchanged.

Shares / bonds

€31,500 / €14,000

Portfolio

€45,500

Shares about 69.23%, above band

Add €400 to bonds

68.63% shares

€31,500 / €45,900, approximately

An exact reset from existing capital moves €4,200: €27,300 shares/€18,200 bonds before costs/taxes. The contribution helps without restoring the target. Exposure rose without a purchase; recent gains establish neither greater loss capacity nor a need for a higher target.

Which gap does the response leave?

3. Income drops

Start again from the original plan. €35,000 portfolio; no market change. Bank cash €10,000 + €15,000 available; nearby bill €15,000 in 24 months.

Income becomes €1,800 monthly; spending stays €2,600 and the €400 contribution runs. Calculate the gap before and after pausing it. What still needs funding?

4. The nearby bill changes

Start again from the original plan. Income €3,000; spending €2,600; contribution €400. Portfolio €35,000; reserve €10,000; bill cash €15,000, all accessible.

The bill becomes €20,000 in six months; portfolio unchanged. Six €400 contributions can be redirected, with no extra savings assumed. Assume all six arrive before the deadline. What remains unfunded?

Discuss the income and deadline gaps
Income-drop scenario, monthly.

Keep contributing

€1,200 gap

€2,600+€400−€1,800

Pause contributions

€800 gap

€2,600−€1,800

The pause does not fund ordinary spending. Check payment dates, feasible cuts, replacement income and automatic-transfer timing. Record reserve use and what remains.

Nearby-goal cash is committed: reassigning it also changes that goal. A sale may become necessary; “always hold” cannot fund bills.

For the independent changed bill, €20,000−€15,000 leaves €5,000. Six €400 payments add €2,400, leaving €2,600. Redirecting them reduces long-term additions. Compare affordable extra saving, reduced/delayed flexible spending or deliberately reassigned capital; a binding payment allows fewer options.

Selling long-term holdings reduces that goal’s funding and may incur costs/tax. Reserve money cannot remain fully assigned to both protection and the bill. More market risk cannot make the six-month shortfall reliable.

Which facts are needed before proceeding?

5. A country move

Start again from the original plan. Portfolio €35,000; bank cash €10,000 + €15,000 accessible. Income €3,000; spending €2,600; contribution €400. Bill €15,000 in 24 months.

A move in four months changes spending currency. Tax residence and continued broker service are unchecked. Name the information and deadlines needed before changing accounts, holdings or contributions.

6. A broker outage

Start again from the original plan. No country move or market change. Portfolio €35,000; income €3,000; contribution €400. Bank cash €10,000 + €15,000 accessible; bill €15,000 in 24 months.

The broker app/website is unavailable, contribution due shortly; bank cash accessible. An unsolicited message offers a recovery link. Separate the service problem, payment and message. What needs attention now?

Discuss the move and outage

For the move, update expenses/currency, check departure/destination tax authorities for actual dates, and preserve cost/transaction records. Ask the provider separately about holding, buying, transferring and withdrawing. Neither closure nor continued residence/service is established; display conversion changes no economic exposure.

The OECD overview is preliminary orientation. Domestic law determines tax residence; several jurisdictions can apply. A permit/address is incomplete evidence. Seek qualified local help for uncertain interactions; product choice can stay open while checks get deadlines.

For the outage, use already trusted contacts/status information. Check pending payments/orders before repeating them; preserve confirmations/reference numbers. Do not send another payment before understanding the first or use the unsolicited link to verify itself. Actual unauthorised activity needs prompt protection through a verified route.

In this case cash needs do not require selling through the unavailable broker today. An outage establishes neither investment loss nor a restoration date. Review confirmed facts if restriction persists or a deadline is threatened.

Revise the rule that failed the test.

Compare responses with your draft: correct starting facts, capital boundary and feasible action. No transaction or an unresolved question can be a reasoned answer. Record missing rules, needed agreement, local/provider information and next steps with deadlines.

  1. Assignments. Give each euro at most one job. Reserve, bill cash and portfolio cannot fund two payments at once.
  2. Amounts and weights. Parts add to the stated boundary; weights use the current denominator. Distinguish flows from returns.
  3. Units. State the period, contribution/withdrawal timing, spending currency and real or nominal price basis.
  4. Assumptions. Separate facts, estimates and missing information. Scenarios supply neither probabilities nor a maximum loss.
  5. Consequences. Show money left, unfunded amounts, missed or redirected additions and payment dates. Name the cost of an alternative.
  6. Unfinished work. Ask a specific question; name the evidence and deadline before relying on its answer.

Use this to check internal consistency in the fictional exercises. It does not establish suitability of real holdings.

Check an unresolved answer and a double-counting correction

For the country move, an acceptable unfinished answer is: “Before the move in four months, ask the provider to confirm continued holding, buying, transfer and withdrawal service for the destination and account. Preserve the written terms. Check tax-residence dates with the relevant authorities or qualified local help separately. Until confirmed, continued service and tax treatment remain unknown.” Naming an answer you need, its source and a deadline is more useful than assuming access survives the move.

In the independent €78,000 worked case from the writing lesson, an incorrect note leaves both €12,000 reserve and €42,528 portfolio after the coupled shock and three months of lost income. The spending gap used €2,850: reserve is €12,000 − €2,850 = €9,150. If later contributions rebuild it, long-term additions must fall by the same amount. Do not show both a replenished reserve and every original contribution funding the long goal.

Reset to this lesson’s original €60,000 household for each of its six tests. Record amended rules and reasons; completing the exercise does not certify suitability or prove future returns.

Check your understanding

Try each question, then check your answer.

Choose questions from another chapter

01

Income falls

In the practice's independent income-drop scenario, net income is €1,800, non-investment spending €2,600 and contributions €400 a month. What gap remains after pausing contributions?

  • No gap.
  • €800 a month.
  • €1,200 a month.
Show the explanation

Correct answer: €800 a month.

Before the pause, €3,000 of outgoings exceeds €1,800 income by €1,200. Removing the €400 contribution leaves €2,600 of spending, so €800 remains unfunded. The pause helps without covering ordinary expenses; any reserve use or other response needs to account for that remaining gap.

Return to the explanation

02

A bill due sooner

Start again from the practice plan. A €20,000 payment is due in six months, with €15,000 already assigned. Six €400 contributions can all arrive before the bill. Ignoring returns and costs, what remains unfunded?

  • €5,000.
  • €2,400.
  • €2,600.
Show the explanation

Correct answer: €2,600.

The initial gap is €5,000. Six contributions add €2,400, leaving €2,600. Using reserve money would require explicitly reassigning it and reducing the protection still available; the same money cannot remain fully assigned to both jobs. Redirecting contributions also changes additions to the long-term goal.

Return to the explanation

Reading list

Before you continue

I have read About, Terms & disclaimer and Privacy & storage. I agree to the terms and acknowledge the privacy notice.

If you do not agree, please leave the site.